I’ll never forget the day a colleague shared this troubling story. Her school had just received its state rankings; it’d climbed ten spots. Yet that same week, three teachers resigned, citing burnout, and parent satisfaction surveys hit an all-time low.
“We’re winning,” she said, “but it feels like we’re losing.” Her experience captures a tension facing school leaders everywhere: our traditional measures of success often miss the very outcomes that matter most.
As educational leaders, we face immense pressure to demonstrate results. Standardized test scores provide precise and comparable data that stakeholders can easily understand. Yet when we rely exclusively on these metrics, we make a critical error; we optimize for what’s easy to measure rather than what’s truly important. We become skilled at raising test scores while potentially neglecting social-emotional development, creativity, critical thinking, and the joy of learning itself.
Consider what happens in districts that fixate solely on assessment data; leaders inadvertently narrow curriculum, reducing time for arts, physical education, and project-based learning. Teachers feel compelled to “teach to the test,” sacrificing deeper engagement for test prep. Students learn that success means filling in the right bubbles rather than asking meaningful questions. We communicate, albeit unintentionally, that compliance matters more than curiosity.
This happens not because leaders lack care, but because we’ve inherited an incomplete paradigm. We’ve been conditioned to believe that rigorous accountability requires singular, quantifiable outcomes. But proper accountability, the kind that honors our commitment to developing the whole child, demands a more comprehensive approach.
So what’s the right path forward?
Start by expanding your definition of student success. Partner with your community—teachers, parents, students, and local stakeholders – to identify the competencies and character traits you want graduates to possess. Does your community value collaboration? Resilience? Civic engagement? Entrepreneurial thinking? Once identified, commit to measuring these outcomes with the same rigor you apply to academic achievement.
Implement a balanced accountability dashboard. Just as effective businesses use balanced scorecards tracking financial, customer, operational, and growth metrics, schools need multidimensional frameworks. Your dashboard might include academic proficiency alongside chronic absenteeism rates, student engagement surveys, post-graduation success indicators, teacher retention rates, and community partnership metrics. As organizational theorist Peter Drucker famously said, “What gets measured gets managed.” The question isn’t whether to measure, it’s what we choose to prioritize.
Leverage qualitative data alongside quantitative measures. Conduct student focus groups to gather feedback on their learning experiences. Document portfolios showcasing creative problem-solving. Track alumni success stories beyond college acceptance rates. Are graduates becoming engaged citizens? Are they pursuing meaningful work? These narratives provide context that numbers alone cannot capture.
Consider adopting frameworks designed explicitly for holistic assessment. The Portrait of a Graduate framework helps communities define and assess locally valued outcomes. These approaches don’t replace academic accountability; they complete it.
Build transparency into your reporting systems. Share your expanded metrics regularly with district leaders, staff, families, and community members. When stakeholders see you valuing multiple dimensions of success, they’ll support comprehensive improvements rather than demanding narrow interventions.
Here’s what I’m asking you to do:
This week, audit your current accountability systems. List every metric your district tracks and reports. Then ask yourself: Do these measures collectively represent the education we promise families? If the answer is no, convene a leadership team to design a more balanced approach.
Schedule listening sessions with teachers, students, and parents to understand what success means to them. Their insights will prove invaluable as you expand your measurement framework.
Finally, identify one new metric you can implement this semester—perhaps a student voice survey or a measure of post-graduation preparedness. Small steps toward comprehensive accountability create momentum for transformational change.
Our students deserve an education that helps them reach their full potential. Our accountability systems should reflect that commitment. What will you measure this year that you haven’t measured before?
#EducatioalLeader,
Kim
When students are led well, they learn well.
References:
- Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management.Harper & Row.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action.Harvard Business School Press.
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st-century learning definitions.Battelle for Kids.
- Vaden, R. (2015). Procrastinate on purpose: 5 permissions to multiply your time. Perigee Books.
The views shared in the Educational Leadership Moment are solely those of Dr. Kim D. Moore and do not reflect the positions of her employer or any entity within the local, state, or federal government sector.
0 comments